Kids were forced to become Christians by being baptised and educated in a religious way, a possible later secession from the church (there is really no correct word for "leaving the church" in your language) will not be respected by the church, because baptism is insoluble. The religious education of kids effects like brainstorming and can cause immense negative consequences for the kids, like uncontrollable fears or the burden with wrong feelings to be guilty. On the other hand the religion doesn´t surely offer a qualificated moralic and ethical direction.
By the way, there is really no exclusion from the church. If you want to leave the church, you will only be punished by an automatical excommunication. Only the right to take part in the sacraments (communion, other churchly services) will be cancelled. Everybody who has been living in a distanced manner from the church, will be really not interested in the excommunication.
Not only the recently getting to be known cases of sexual misuse of kids at church will make it clear, that we have to protect our kids from the church!
Please don´t misunderstand me, it will not be my intention to deny the RIGHT of free practising of religion to any religious community or church, neither to the Christian, Islamic, Jewish etc. population, not even protagonists of Bhagwhan or Scientology. My demand is only the necessary removal of abuses respectively the non - introduction of privileges, that means special or favored rights of religious communities and churches.
THE RIGHT OF FREE PRACTISING OF RELIGION COVERS:
* The foundation of new churches or religious communities. The state and the society are not allowed to refuse to such an organization the right to call itself to be a church or religous community.
* The construction of churches, mosques, synagogues etc., as far as they are not being financed in a forced way by the state and the generality. The general building law has to be valid, special restrictions are not allowed. So the Swiss initiative for the prohibition of minaretts has caused a lot of damages recently, because that was the wrong starting point for critics.
* The obligation of the state to protect the right of free practising of religion in the same way other personnel rights are being protected too.
* The right of the churches and religious communities to make public relations for their faiths in a fair way in public (mission), for exemple by having their own radio and television stations and publishing houses for print medias etc., public demonstrations etc.. (I refer to that their are some kinds of public relation methods in the economic sector illegal - unfair competition - and forbidden, for exemple telephon marketing by German laws).
* The right of churches and religious communities to collect subcriptions and donations given in a volunteer way from their members, but this amount may not be assessed by the stately taxes.
* The wearing of kerchiefs, necklets with a cruzifix, badges etc. in public. Functionaries and employees of the public service should be excepted from this rule during they are doing their jobs, because they are obligated to religious neutrality as servants of the state.
...BUT THE RIGHT OF PRACTISING RELIGION DOES NOT COVER:
* All religious activities injuring the rights of third persons, like...
...religious education of kids,
...baptisme of kids, circumcisions of kids and similar procedurs,
...avoidable annoyances by church bell ringing, the cry of the muezzin etc.,
...the protection of religious, churchly holidays,
...the demand of stately church financing or further favoring of practising religion,
...to leave off birth control. It ´s really a fact that Islamic people have got a lot of children which threaten the economical and ecological steadiness of Europe. (Details: here.).
...the demand of other privileges, for exemple the release of clergymen from the general obligation to serve in armed forces.
URGENT HINT: The Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) of the Federal Republic of Germany has got the opinion that religious freedom will cover churchly privileges. By this decision the German justice has disqualified a new the Federal Republic of Germany to be a legal state.
(Hamburger Abendblatt of Dec. 1st 2009 to the theme "special opening at the four sundays during the Advent saison". Notice: In Germany shops are normally closed on sundays and holidays.)
EXCEPTIONS FROM THIS PRINCIPLE:
" All men / organizations have to be treated by the state in the same way, nobody may be favored by privileges."
` People who are injured in their manner of living, because they are affected by handikaps, a disease or because of their very young or very old age, have got the claim of privileges (for exemple: parking places for disabled persons, cartes blanches etc.) in order to ease their lives. The generality is obligated to pay regard for them.
* Organizations which are responsible for security and public order in the interst of the generality. Police, fire - brigade, removal of refuse etc..
But religious people / religious communities or churches do not belong to this privileged circles.